LEGION® System
Your Entry to the Alcon Phaco Performance Advantage
Step up your practice with your entry to the Alcon phaco performance advantage.
LEGION® System Your Entry to the Alcon Phaco Performance Advantage
Step up your practice with your entry to the Alcon phaco performance advantage.
Increased Stability During Phacoemulsification
LEGION® System offers better surge protection than INFINITI® at various vacuum limits, reducing the risk of PCR and capsule related problems.1-6
Surge Protection with Gravity Fluidics Systems7
Surge Volume After Occlusion Break8
(IOP 55 mmHg; Vac setting 550 mmHg; Asp 40 cc/min; 55 mmHg = 75 cm H2O)
· 50% faster recovery from surge
· 30% less surge
Enhanced Efficiency
Intuitive User Interface
LEGION® System’s intuitive graphic user interface enables quick adjustment and enhanced customisation of surgical parameters and settings.12
Convenient Design and Running Cost
LEGION® System can be used as a table-top unit or mounted on its optional cart and it allows for optimisation of total cost management.12
Accessories for optimised total cost management
Reusable Electric Anterior
Vitrectromy Handpiece12
23G Anterior Vitrectomy Disposable Tip and Anterior Vitrectomy Consumable12
CENTURION® Vision System with ACTIVE SENTRY® Handpiece
The leading technology in phacoemulsification, offering a new baseline of safety, consistency and efficiency in every cataract procedure.1,2,7,13-17
CENTURION® Silver System
Alcon’s most advanced gravity system, with enhanced stability and efficiency during phacoemulsification.1-6,8,18
INTREPID® Phaco Tips and I/A Handpieces
Enhance phaco procedures by merging CENTURION®-based systems technology with the effectiveness and versatility of the INTREPID® Hybrid Tip, INTREPID® BALANCED tip and INTREPID® Transformer I/A Handpiece.10,19-21
Clinical Support
Technical Specifications
Instructions for Use (IFU)
For a full list of indications, contraindications and warnings, please visit ifu.alcon.com and refer to the relevant product’s instructions for use.
Alcon Experience Academy
For relevant training content from industry thought leaders
References
1. Thorne A, Dyk DW, Fanney D, Miller KM. Phacoemulsifier occlusion break surge volume reduction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Dec;44(12):1491-1496.
2. Aravena C, Dyk DW, Thorne A, Fanney D, Miller KM. Aqueous volume loss associated with occlusion break surge in phacoemulsifiers from 4 different manufacturers. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Jul;44(7):884-888.
3. Nicoli CM, Dimalanta R, Miller KM. Experimental anterior chamber maintenance in active versus passive phacoemulsification fluidics systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):157:162.
4. Dyk DW, Miller KM. Mechanical model of human eye compliance for volumetric occlusion break surge measurements. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018 Feb;44(2):231-236.
5. Narendran N, et al. The Cataract National Dataset electronic multicentre audit of 55 567 operations: Risk stratification for posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss. Eye. 2009;23:31–37.
6. Salowi MA, et al. The Malaysian Cataract Surgery Registry: Risk indicators for posterior capsular rupture. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:1466–1470.
7. Alcon Data on File, REF-02559, 2017.
8. Alcon Data on File, REF-08357, 2020.
9. Christakis PG, Braga-Mele RM. Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcome comparison of longitudinal, torsional, and transversal phacoemulsification machines. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38(2):234-241.
10. Zacharias J. Thermal characterization of phacoemulsification probes operated in axial and torsional modes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(1):208-216.
11. Zacharias J. Comparative thermal characterization of phacoemulsification probes operated in elliptical, torsional and longitudinal ultrasound modalities. ASCRS-ASOA Symposium and Congress; April 25-29, 2014; Boston, MA.
12. LEGION® System Operator’s Manual.
13. CENTURION® Vision System Operator's Manual.
14. Khokhar S, Aron N, Sen S, Pillay G, Agarwal E. Effect of balanced phacoemulsification tip on the outcomes of torsional phacoemulsification using an active-fluidics system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43(1):22-28.
15. Malik PK, Dewan T, Patidar AK, Sain E. Effect of IOP based infusion system with and without balanced phacotip on cumulative dissipated energy and estimated fluid usage in comparison to gravity fed infusion in torsional phacoemulsification. Eye Vis (Lond). 2017;4:22.
16. Zacharias J. Laboratory assessment of thermal characteristics of three phacoemulsification tip designs operated using torsional ultrasound. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016:10;1095–1101.
17. Vasavada AR, et al. Comparison of torsional and microburst longitudinal phacoemulsification: A prospective, randomized, masked clinical trial. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2010;41(1):109-114.
18. Sharif-Kashani P, Fanney D, Injev V. Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:96.
19. Alcon Data on File, REF-07136, 2019.
20. Noguchi S, et al. Difference in torsional phacoemulsification oscillation between a balanced tip and a mini tip using an ultra-high-speed video camera. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1511–1517.
21. Intrepid® Transformer I/A Handpiece Directions for use.
For indications, contraindications and warnings please refer to the relevant product's instruction for use.