click
MyAlcon Professional Logo
MyAlcon for Consumers

MyAlcon | India

This page is available in English. Select below for other locations.

Select another location

UltraSert® Preloaded
Delivery System


Unique delivery options that meet your individual needs of consistency,

efficiency and control.

UltraSert® Preloaded Delivery System

Unique delivery options that meet your individual needs of consistency, efficiency and control.

 

Gain consistency in IOL delivery, injection control and enhance the efficiency of your OR1

Consistency in IOL Delivery for Reduced
Intraoperative Variability1-3

Large blue text that states “98 percent of IOL implantations with UltraSert were performed with consistent leading haptic configuration.”

Bar graph illustrating UltraSert’s leading haptic configurations. The two preferred delivery configurations are deep tuck and tuck looped. The graph highlights that 98 percent of deliveries were performed with these delivery configurations. The graph also displays the remaining 2 percent of other delivery configurations. These are looped, straight and looped outside configurations.

* Observations during porcine cadaver eye study to evaluate consistency of leading haptic configuration using permissible delivery configurations identified in the UltraSert® Directions for Use. Study conducted using UltraSert® optimized with 3 mm (extended) tip and inner lumen adjustment (n=184-187). VISCOAT® OVD was used at operating room temperatures (approximately 65 to 73 degrees).

UltraSert® helps minimise wound stretch compared to other delivery devices1,5,6

Bar graph comparing the wound stretch size for UltraSert, iTec, iSert 250/251, and Monarch III. The bar graph displays that UltraSert has the smallest incision size based on the number of studies done measuring pre-implantation incision size and mean corneal incision size after IOL implantation.

*Before IOL implantation, corneal incisions were made (2.2 mm knife for IOL implantation with UltraSert®, iTec† and iSert† 250/251; 2.4 mm knife for IOL implantation with Monarch® III) and initial incision size was measured and documented. Post-IOL implantation incision size was measured and documented via the same process. UltraSert® (n=19) presented with a significantly smaller mean corneal incision size after IOL implantation compared with iTec† (n=26), iSert† 250/251 (n=26) and Monarch® III (n=28). For each, p < 0.001. Testing completed with first-generation UltraSert® (2 mm nozzle tip). †Trademarks are the property of their respective owners

Enhanced Injection Control for Smooth IOL Delivery1

 

 UltraSert® features the spring-controlled TensionGlide™ Plunger for smooth IOL deployment.1

TensionGlide™ maintains
injection force stability

TensionGlide™ mitigates the risk of sudden forceful IOL ejection, offering the ideal amount of resistance1,7,8

A line graph illustrating UltraSert’s average plunger force and plunger travel distance with and without the proprietary TensionGlide spring. A blue text box on the graph highlights the average plunger force during the IOL delivery stage when using TensionGlide and says that the UltraSert is “always within around 18 percent of delivery force of peak force.” Without TensionGlide, a grey text box on the graph highlights that the UltraSert’s delivery force drops around 70 percent from peak force during the IOL delivery stage.

Improved Efficiency and Enhanced Patient Throughput5,9

 

UltraSert® enhances patient throughput by reducing the amount of preparation time needed compared to other delivery devices.5,9

Horizontal bar graph comparing 5 devices and the amount of preparation time needed in seconds for opening the pack, OVD injection and advancing the IOL in nozzle. UltraSert, iTec, iSert, RayOne, and CT Lucia delivery devices are all compared. The graph displays that iSert totals 76 seconds, RayOne totals 63 seconds, CT Lucia totals 60 seconds, iTec totals 56 seconds and UltraSert totals 39 seconds in preparation time

* Trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

UltraSert® is ready to implant in 3 simple steps

Illustration of the first step in UltraSert device implant preparation. A blue arrow points towards the Viscoelastic Port where UltraSert is being filled with a viscoelastic. A second blue arrow with text that reads “Fill-to Line” points towards the tip of the device. Two illustrations of the second step in UltraSert device implant preparation. The left image has a hand pulling out the lens stop from an UltraSert device. The right image has a hand pulling out the plunger from an UltraSert device. Illustration of the third step in UltraSert device implant preparation. Push to fold, then inspect. A blue arrow points towards the device with text that reads “Fill-to Line.” A large blue circle with text that reads “7 seconds” sits to the left of the UltraSert Preloaded Delivery System to highlight that it takes at least 7 seconds to complete this lens-folding step.

Learn how to use the
UltraSert® Delivery System

Download Loading Instructions
 
 

UltraSert® is Preloaded
with AcrySof® IQ IOL

 

The trusted IOL that gives you confidence

Learn More About AcrySof® IQ IOL
UltraSert Preloaded Delivery System with a circle over the device to indicate where you would input the AcrySof IQ IOL. A close-up 3-dimensional image of two IOLs sit to the left the UltraSert Delivery System.UltraSert Preloaded Delivery System with a circle over the device to indicate where you would input the AcrySof IQ IOL. A close-up 3-dimensional image of two IOLs sit to the left the UltraSert Delivery System.

Clinical Studies

Liu J, Wolfe P, Hernandez V & Kohnen T. Comparative assessment of the corneal incision enlargement of 4 preloaded IOL delivery systems

 

Comparing the corneal incision size enlargement after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation of a new, automated, preloaded delivery system, AutonoMe, vs that of 3 other available preloaded systems (UltraSert, Vivinex iSert, and Tecnis iTec)

Mendicute J, Amzallag T, Wang L, & Martinez AA. Comparison of incision size and intraocular lens performance after implantation with three preloaded systems and one manual delivery system

 

Comparing corneal incision size and intraocular lens (IOL) performance/behavior following implantation with the following delivery systems: UltraSert®, Hoya iSert® 250/251, Tecnis® iTec, and Monarch® III Delivery System

Mendicute J, Bascaran L, Pablo L, et al. Multicenter evaluation of time, operational, and economic efficiencies of a new preloaded intraocular lens delivery system versus manual intraocular lens delivery

 

Evaluating intraoperative intraocular lens (IOL) delivery time and total surgical case time using the UltraSert preloaded delivery system during routine cataract surgeries and to compare with the manually loaded Monarch delivery system

Technical Specifications1

Chart

Instructions for Use (IFU)

 

For a full list of indications, contraindications and warnings, please visit ifu.alcon.com and refer to the relevant product’s instructions for use.

Visit IFU Database

Alcon Experience Academy

 

For relevant training content from industry thought leaders

Visit AEA Portal

References:

1. Alcon Data on File, REF-07655, 2019.
2. Wang L, Wolfe P, Chernosky A, Paliwal S, Tjia K, Lane S. In vitro delivery performance assessment of a new preloaded intraocular lens delivery system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(12):1814–1820.
3. Mendicute J, Amzallag T, Wang L, Martinez AA. Comparison of incision size and intraocular lens performance after implantation with three preloaded systems and one manual delivery system. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:1495–1503.
4. Alcon Data on File, REF-04197, 2019.

5. Mendicute J, Bascaran L, Pablo L, et al. Multicenter evaluation of time, operational, and economic efficiencies of a new preloaded intraocular lens delivery system versus manual intraocular lens delivery. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:591-599. 
6. Amzallag T, Mendicute J, Martinez A. Multicenter clinical assessment of a pre-loaded IOL delivery system. Paper presented at ASCRS Congress; May 5-9, 2017; Los Angeles, CA.
7. Alcon Data on File, REF-02260, 2016.
8. Alcon Data on File, REF-07653, 2015.
9. Nanavaty MA, Kubrak-Kisza M. Evaluation of preloaded intraocular lens injection systems: Ex vivo study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Apr;43(4):558-563.

 

Please refer to the relevant product direction for use for list of indications, contraindications and warnings.

©2022 Alcon Inc. 1/22 IN-ULS-2200001
India
Alcon See Briliantly